Check your URL and RSS Feeds!!!!! February 1, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Uncategorized.add a comment
I am excited to bring up my blog on a different host! Progress is all around.
Please note the changes to the web address and the RSS feed address!
PLEASE GO TO
BLOG ADDRESS: WWW.REFOCUSINGTECHNOLOGY.COM
AND
RSS FEED: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/RefocusingTechnology
Excellent New Quote to add January 30, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Other.add a comment
I just read an excellent quote that I have to add:
“Accountability breeds responsibility.” Stephen R. Covey
New Quote January 28, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Other.add a comment
Just thought I would let you know that I added a new quote to the Quotes page:
When the world says, “Give up,” hope whispers,”Try it one more time”. ~ Unknown
Google to get Skype’d?? January 27, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Business, Efficient Technologies, Tools.Tags: Acquisition, Google, Skype
add a comment
Just read a “rumor” that EBay is looking at selling Skype. Rumor has it that Google may be the suitor. That could be quite an acquistion for Google. They are quickly expanding their offerings and this could really help them to expand the potential of VOIP. Skype also makes pretty good money so that could be good for the bottom line.
Google could rapidly become the one stop shop for online communcation. Also, how can Skype and Android be integrated?? Very interesting potentials when you consider Google’s focus and other assets. Interesting rumor. We’ll see what happens.
What’s with all the titles? January 27, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Business, Development Process, Resourcing.Tags: Architect, Developer, Enterprise Architect, Programmer
add a comment
In today’s IT market buzzwords are definitely the sale point. Microsoft has made an artform out of changing technology names to flashy names. This also occurs in the market for resources. You will hear terms like analyst, programmer analyst, senior developer, team lead, architect, etc when it comes to the development realm. I think that the definition will depend on a company by company basis. I would like to give a brief idea of what I see as the differences.
Analyst
An analyst’s job is very self explanatory. They do analysis of business systems. The main focus is to outline the business need and document the requirements. In most cases this person is semi-technical but not typically a developer.
Progammer/Developer
This is someone I see as able to write code. They are given a technical specification for a system and they write the necessary logic to make it work. They should be able to write the code and troubleshoot it to make it work. Typically will not create design or architecture models.
Senior Programmer/Developer
Very simply this is an experienced developer. Typically I would say that somewhere in the 5-7 year range will transition developers into this category. Some are able to transition before that. It is primarily based on skillset combined with experience.
Software/System Architect
Architects titles will change but the general concept is that they are able to see things from a high level structure and can think though the best model for system design. They understand business, software, and systems. The architect will look at things from a long-term viewpoint to build a system that will adjust to meet needs in the future not just current needs. The person would be able to do the job of a developer but would add to that the ability to see things from a high level. This type of person has a mixture of skill and experience. Experience alone is not enough. This is not a skill that can necessarily be learned because it is dependent on ability.
Team Lead
This role is usually a senior developer or architect that has some level of management and mentoring responsibilities. A team lead will NOT always be an architect. Many times you will find that the person will be a developer and not have the skillset of an architect.
Enterprise Architect
The enterprise architect is a higher level architect. A software/system architect would tend to focus on systems, the enterprise architect would focus on the entire enterprises architecture. This would include software, networks, external connections, etc. They will look at the overall architecture of the entire business system.
Summary
There is definitely a difference in the roles that are played. Also, there is huge difference between the titles from company to company. In some places people can move into architecture roles purely through seniority. If you are trying to hire people don’t just look at titles look at what they have done. I hope that this brief outline will give you a better idea of what you are looking for.
Dung Powered Water Purifier! January 23, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Business, Efficient Technologies, Green Business.Tags: Green, Segway, Water Purification
add a comment
No I’m not kidding. There is a company in the U.S. that has created a water purifier for questionable water sources (ocean, urine, sewage, etc) that can be powered by cow dung! Sounds strange but in thinking it sounds like a great idea.
Here’s a summary (from: 25 Most Promising Green Businesses).
Better known as the inventor of the Segway, Dean Kamen is now manufacturing the Slingshot, a filterless water purifier that makes drinking water out of sketchy water sources like sewage, ocean water, and urine. It runs off of cow dung and generates enough electricity to run a building full of light bulbs. Hoping to instigate a phenomenon, Kamen is handing units to impoverished villages. The handy device costs the rest of us $1,000-$2,000.
Here’s a couple of another link that I found about this To Build a Better World.
It is amazing what inventors can come up with. No limit to innovation!
Great post: 5 Steps to Improve Productivity January 22, 2009
Posted by Jeremy in Business, Tools.Tags: Business, Efficiency, Productivity
add a comment
Okay, this article is very loosely technology related but I thought that you might find it very helpful. I think that author discusses some great efficiency/productivity tips.
5 Tips for More Productivity in 2009
In the article the author says the following:
And AVOID the “summary” section of a meeting in these emails. Truth is, very few people read it.
That was amazing to me. I actually always read it and I like to have an Agenda in that area. I guess it really depends on the person.
There was also a duh moment in here to me. When I read it, I really thought that it was a paradigm shift for many. It was when he said:
In meetings, too many people focus more on taking notes than on capturing action steps. We focus more on communication, storage, and organization of information than on the one thing that actually moves us forward: ACTION.
Great quote. Very good post.
I hope that it helps you!


